Another tax will not solve roaming. Ending NIMBYism could

For the publisher: There is another municipal voting initiative in the works to levy a new tax to help finance housing for the homeless. Let’s be realistic about this problem.

Over $ 1 billion has been set aside to fund housing and services for the homeless in recent years. Polls have shown Los Angeles voters support the construction of more housing and shelters, and they overwhelmingly blame local politicians for the state of affairs.

A better question to ask in surveys is: Do you approve of having a homeless housing complex or shelter next to you, across from your house, down the street, or even? in your neighborhood? I bet you would get a very different answer than the polls we’ve seen.

Whenever there is a project to build housing or shelter for the homeless, members of the housed community come together to stop the project. So we need to stop blaming politicians and instead blame ourselves, because the problem will never be solved as long as people say, ‘Not in my neighborhood’.

David Craft, Los Angeles


For the publisher: We do not need another election measure for more taxes of any kind. What we need first is accountability for previous proposals and taxes.

I find it amazing that people continue to vote for more taxes and more bonds when there does not seem to be any accountability. Billions have been collected and spent statewide over the past few years, and where has that money gone? It doesn’t seem to get people off the streets.

We need the electoral measure proposed by Los Angeles city councilor Joe Buscaino, mayoral candidate: no camping on sidewalks or other public places if you are offered housing or shelter.

Dafni Black, Culver City


For the publisher: The proposed tax on home sales over $ 5 million to reduce homelessness is a bad idea. A better idea is to tax those who caused the homelessness crisis.

During the 2007-2009 recession, approximately 10 million homes were lost due to foreclosure. Well, they weren’t really lost; they were bought in bulk from the banks by real estate investment trusts and other hedge funds at very favorable prices. These mega-owners now control the rental market, and if you want to rent you have to follow their rules.

We no longer deal with mom-and-pop owners. Rents are now what the market supports and competition is severely restricted. This leads to evictions and the inability of these tenants to re-pass a credit check required to rent an apartment.

There is no foolproof solution, but homeowners with three or more units should be required to pay municipal and county taxes on rental receipts and a surcharge on units not rented for more than two months. If they don’t pay, they should be denied access to the courts for evictions.

Terrence Cooney, Studio City

Source link

Previous Did Joe Manchin just derail Biden's plan? (Opinion)
Next School board approves new vehicle tracking system | Derby News