NGT compensates SCCL for excessive mining

The National Green Tribunal (NGT) ordered Singareni Collieries Company Ltd (SCCL) to pay environmental compensation for the excess coal mined from the JVR OC-I mine and to extract the coal only to the extent of the authorization environmental.

He also made it clear that the company would only be able to opt for an additional amount of coal mining after obtaining a separate license for it. Hearing the proceedings in a petition filed by B. Nandu Nailk, O. Srinivas Reddy and others last week practically over excessive mining carried out by the Singareni resulting in large-scale environmental damage, the southern zone shoal of NGT led the joint committee which investigated in the aspect of filing an additional report considering compensation to be paid by the mining company for excess mining already carried out.

The NGT bench, composed of the judicial member K. Ramakrishnan and the expert member K. Satyagopal, observed that the search for a bank guarantee of 26.67 crore as a performance guarantee for the realization of certain works is different from the assessment of environmental compensation for violation of excessive mining and the two stand on a different basis.

After reviewing the joint committee report submitted prior to NGT, the bench asked the panel to assess the environmental compensation to be collected from SCCL for excessive coal mining already carried out in violation of EC standards. The amount requested as a bank guarantee was intended for the implementation of the mine’s environmental management plan – a plan to clean up and increase the community’s natural resources over a period of three years, estimated the Bank.

In addition to environmental compensation, the company was also required to pay royalties with a penalty for excess mining carried out, as provided for in the mining rules for the extended part of mining carried out in addition to the measure. being considered for environmental clearance, said the NGT bench. and asked the parity committee to clarify whether they had imposed and realized such an amount.

In addition, the NGT asked the committee what was the survival rate of the green belt and what are the corrective measures to recover if the survival rate was less than the required percentage, as it simply mentioned that the survival rate is too Well. in his report.

The bench also raised questions about the Telangana State Pollution Control Board (PCB) reports on ambient air quality and water quality in the Jeenugurupally reservoir. They observed that the air quality was checked when mining was not in progress and it was also not checked when the coal was transported from the mine.

He also asked the PCB to file a report on the action taken, to ensure the compliance of the panel’s recommendations by the company and to postpone the case until August 12.

Source link

Previous Detroit Pistons give ticket holders on court a new perk: a bar
Next Health insurance: insurance against vector-borne diseases